A BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE EH DIPOLE ANTENNA
AND
SOME NOTES ON EFFICIENCY


Lloyd Butler VK5BR
(July 2003)

Antenna Efficiency



An antenna is efficient if its radiation resistance is large compared to the loss resistance. Loss resistance can exist in the matching circuit, the antenna conductors and earth resistance if earth is part of the antenna system.


The problem with small antennas is that radiation resistance is normally very low and hence small antennas can be very inefficient. The whole idea of the Crossed Field Antenna or the EH Antenna is to generate a radiation field close to the antenna in the normally near field region. This provides a better match to space impedance, increases the radiation resistance and for the small antenna, increases its efficiency.


Here are some basic facts concerning making antennas more efficient:

(1) There is no way you can make an efficient antenna much more efficient - the antenna is a coupling device not a generator and can only radiate what power you put in. (Of course you can alter its radiation pattern to concentrate signal in a desired direction).

(2) An inefficient antenna can be made more efficient either of two ways:

(a) Lower its loss resistance compared to its radiation resistance (example the magnetic loop).

(b) Increase its radiation resistance relative to its loss resistance (That is what the EH is credited with doing).

(3) Bandwidth is inversely proportional to Q (i.e. ratio of reactance to resistance). Hence 2(a) narrows the bandwidth and 2(b) broadens the bandwidth. So the magnetic loop is a narrow band antenna and the EH is a broad band antenna.


The EH Antenna



The theory of the crossed field operation (not universally supported) is based on creating an electric (E) field in phase and at right angles to a magnetic (H) field in suitable proportions. To do this two E fields are generated with 90 degrees phase difference. The displacement current from one of the two fields generates an H field in phase with the other E field.


In the EH antenna with the L+L type matching network, a main E field is developed differentially across the two dipole plates and a secondary E field, at 90 degrees phase difference, is developed longitudinally between the plates and the reference coax shield. In the EH antenna with the L+T matching network, the main E field is developed between the top dipole plate and the common connection of the coax shield and the bottom plate. A secondary E field shifted by 90 degrees across the last coil in the matching network is developed from the coil assembly to the reference common.


One characteristic of the two types of EH antenna is that current runs down the outer shield of the coaxial feeder. Where the coax is elevated, radiation occurs from this section and can possibly be used to advantage. However where the coax continues past building structure and close to earth, induction into these can amount to power loss. Also with the coax led right into the radio shack, the current causes undesirable fields within the shack itself.


To prevent the coax shield current causing undesirable effects, a trap is placed in the coax line. The trap may be placed close to the EH antenna input to ensure that the antenna operates essentially in its crossed field or EH mode. If it is placed down further, it should be placed well beyond the coax section which is directly adjacent to buildings or earth. The nearer the trap is to the antenna, the less the positioning of the coax will effect the antenna tuning. With the trap close to the antenna, it is much more stable to tune. One thing observed in testing the L+L type antenna is that the radiation tends to be concentrated more at a lower angle if a short length of coax is used between the trap and the antenna input. So you may choose to use a short length to the trap (say one metre) rather than no coax at all.


There are critics who argue that the cross field theory cannot work and that the EH antenna is no more than a simple dipole with low radiation resistance and the main radiation is due to current in the coax shield with resultant operation as a vertical antenna.
However in practical operation:

     The antenna does spring to life when the 90 degrees phase shift is established between the two E fields and the
         phase shift seems to be a necessary function to make the antenna really work.

     Furthermore the antenna matches with matching network components suited for a much higher radiation resistance
        than a simple dipole and works without excessive loss in those matching components. (**)

    It also matches just the same when the trap is fitted right at the antenna input connector and there is no coax in circuit.

For these reasons, the theory of the critics seems to fall down.



** Note: We are talking about series resistance - In the case of the L+L network, matching is actually made to the equivalent shunt radiation resistance which is lower than the equivalent shunt loss resistance .

From my testing with the L+L type EH antenna, it works quite well compared to a larger antenna. However I see no point in erecting an EH antenna at height if you can achieve good efficiency with a wire or rod at that same height. (Refer to my point (1) above).
But if you don’t have the room for a larger or higher antenna which would be efficient, you might have room to fit an EH dipole antenna to achieve much more efficient broadband operation than a short dipole or monopole. There is one limitation; each EH antenna is made for a single frequency band and you can’t use it on another band.


For more detail, refer to the following:


EH Antennas 20 and 40 metres
A New Theory
Notes on the L+T Network Antenna
Tests for the H Field
Antenna without Coax Shield Current


Back to HomePage